Dropbox Lied About Data Security, Complaint to FTC Alleges

Dropbox, the wildly popular online storage system, deceived users about the security and encryption of its services, putting it at a competitive advantage, according to an FTC complaint filed Thursday by a prominent security researcher.

The FTC complaint charges Dropbox (.pdf) with telling users that their files were totally encrypted and even Dropbox employees could not see the contents of the file. Ph.D. student Christopher Soghoian published data last month showing that Dropbox could indeed see the contents of files, putting users at risk of government searches, rogue Dropbox employees, and even companies trying to bring mass copyright-infringement suits.

Soghoian, who spent a year working at the FTC, charges that Dropbox ?has and continues to make deceptive statements to consumers regarding the extent to which it protects and encrypts therir data,? which amounts to a deceptive trade practice that can be investigated by the FTC.

Dropbox, which has more than 25 million users, revised its website claims about its data security April 13, from:

All files stored on Dropbox servers are encrypted (AES256) and are inaccessible without your account password.

to:

All files stored on Dropbox servers are encrypted (AES 256).

The difference, Soghoian charges, is very important. (If his name sounds familiar, you might remember him as the one who exposed Facebook?s attempt to place anti-Google stories in the press this week.)

Dropbox saves storage space by analyzing users? files before they are uploaded, using what?s known as a hash ? which is basically a short signature of the file based on its contents. If another Dropbox user has already stored that file, Dropbox doesn?t actually upload the file, and simply ?adds? the file to the user?s Dropbox.

The keys used to encrypt and decrypt files also are in the hands of Dropbox, not stored on each user?s machines.

Those architecture choices mean that Dropbox employees can see the contents of a user?s storage, and can turn over the nonencrypted files to the government or outside organizations when presented with a subpoena.

But Dropbox promised otherwise, the complaint alleges.

Up until April 13, the site promised this:

Dropbox employees aren?t able to access user files, and when troubleshooting an account, they only have access to file metadata (filenames, file sizes, etc. not the file contents).

Now the site says:

Dropbox employees are prohibited from viewing the content of files you store in your Dropboxaccount, and are only permitted to view file metadata (e.g., file names and locations).

The company also added this text:

Like most online services, we have a small number of employees who must be able to access user data for the reasons stated in our privacy policy (e.g., when legally required to do so). But that?s the rare exception, not the rule. We have strict policy and technical access controls that prohibit employee access except in these rare circumstances. In addition, we employ a number of physical and electronic security measures to protect user information from unauthorized access.

The complaint alleges that at least two of Dropbox?s competitors, SpiderOak and Wuala, make security promises similiar to those of Dropbox, but actually can?t get at the data because they don?t hold the encryption keys. That means those services have to spend more on storage, because they can?t detect duplicate files. That, according to the complaint, lets Dropbox promise total security without paying the costs, while putting its competitors at a disadvantage.

Dropbox?s security statements were confusing to users ? including to computer security experts, the complaint alleges.

Soghoian cites as evidence comments on Dropbox?s own blog and a Tweet from Jon Callas, who spent years as chief technology officer of PGP Corporation, one of most respected provider of encryption products. Callas now works for Apple, focusing on security.

Callas tweeted on April 19: ?I deleted my Dropbox account. It turns out that they lied and don?t actually encrypt your files and will hand them over to anyone who asks.?

The complaint additionally alleges that Dropbox misleads users of its mobile app, by claiming that its product uses an encrypted HTTPS connection to communicate between a user?s device and Dropbox?s servers. In fact, the mobile device does not encrypt all the traffic.

Soghoian is asking the FTC to force Dropbox to clarify its website further, to contact all its users to tell them Dropbox can see their data in the clear, offer refunds to ?Pro? users and prohibit the company from making deceptive claims in the future.

Dropbox did not respond to an e-mailed request for comment on the complaint.

Source: http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/index/~3/KZyMvKY7Ho8/

doctor who season 6 moses papa johns roadrunner disney world